Peer-review process

The scientific articles submitted to the journal "Scientific Bulletin: Public Administration" undergo a review process (with the provision of the anonymity of the reviewer).

The reviewer's questionnaire highlights the following questions:

• The presence of a conflictual interest in the reviewer?
• The originality of the text?
• Does the title of the article correspond to the content?
• Does the summary of the article reflect?
• The relevance of the article is disclosed in sufficient quantity?
• Is the connection between the problem posed in the article and the important scientific or practical tasks justified?
• Are the article goals relevant to the problem that the author considers?
• Are the findings based on theoretical analysis and / or experimental results?
• Is there a need to change the scope of the article?
• Is sufficient justification of the received scientific results?
• The following conclusions are consistent with the content of the article?
• An analysis of the prospects for further research in the article is marked by a scientific style?
• Linguistic literacy of the article.

The submitted articles are reviewed by the reviewer within 3 weeks.

The reviewer reserves the right to reject an article that does not meet the requirements, or the subject matter of the publication.

An article, not recommended by the reviewer prior to publication, is not accepted until reconsideration.

The presence of a positive review is not sufficient reason for the publication of the article.