ALGORITHMIC COMPETENCIES OF THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SPECIALIST: ALGORITHMIC KNOWLEDGE, ALGORITHMIC THINKING, ALGORITHMIC CULTURE

Abstract

The article analyzes the approaches to reforming the principles of the public administration of information and communication means by algorithmic sequencing of the administrative actions of a specialist. The transformation is revealed by the expediency of forming the algorithmic competence of the public administration specialists through the acquisition of algorithmic competencies for compiling algorithms, algorithmic thinking of their execution and the use of algorithmic culture for algorithmic prescriptions in making administrative decisions.

The analytical review of the regulatory framework and modern approaches to the sequence of actions of a specialist in the public administration using algorithms makes it possible to determine the need and expediency of developing appropriate technology, which should be a convenient tool for analysis, to develop effective administration decisions for their solution, which will allow to correct the administration actions of a modern leader. The legislative initiatives and concepts defining the main direction of the state regarding e-government, organization of electronic document circulation and Internet - interaction of the specialists in the public administration with the public are outlined. Separately are defined the concepts of “algorithm”, algorithmic competencies, algorithmic thinking, algorithmic culture, competence, algorithmic competence.

On the basis of the conducted research it is established that the algorithmic competence of specialists, as a component of information and digital competence, illuminates the connection between the concepts of “algorithmic competences”, “algorithmic thinking”, “algorithmic culture”, which ensure the adoption of administration decisions. The relationship between the compilation of algorithmic control instructions and the compilation of flowcharts in programming is disclosed. The expediency of using such communication in the decision-making of the public administration specialists is shown to prevent their mistakes.