EVOLUTION OF THE GENDER STEREOTYPES ACCORDING TO THE TYPES OF THE STATE, RELATIONS OF POWER, DOMINATION

Abstract

The ways of improving gender stereotypes in the public administration system according to the types of the state, relations of power, domination and more are traced. In the course of the study of gender stereotypes, relations of the sexes in the public service and in the society in general, the following dynamics were observed. Analyzing the scientific literature, it has emerged that the comparative characteristics of different models of gender equality policy traditionally take into account predominantly the existing models of the state types, power relations and domination. Accordingly, the aim is to investigate the analysis of the types of societies, namely: anthropocentric and sociocentric within the framework of the socio-cultural approach.

Analyzing the literature, it is concluded that the comparative characteristics of different models of gender equality policy traditionally take into account predominantly the existing models of the state types, power relations and domination. Accordingly, an analysis of the types of the societies: anthropocentric and sociocentric within the sociocultural approach, should be added to this.

The analysis is based on the practical solution of the gender imbalances in the system of the state administration, public service and public management in terms of the anthropocentric paradigm of the scientific knowledge. Because, in the system of the public administration, from the point of view of gender equality and eradication of the gender stereotypes, the idea of human- centrism as an anthropological basis of governance should lie. Its application helps to make the legal, political, social, economic institutions oriented towards the individual. Because a person, an individual, regardless of gender, is the focal point of managing all the social processes. That is why the study and implementation of the idea of human-centrism must underlie all the socio-political, state, economic, social, etc. social relations.